<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Aaron Gervais, composer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aarongervais.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aarongervais.com</link>
	<description>Website for composer Aaron Gervais</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Schizo Psycho by Aaron Gervais</title>
		<link>http://aarongervais.com/music/schizo-psycho/comment-page-1/#comment-20495</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gervais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongervais.com/?p=1804#comment-20495</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re confused about the meaning of &quot;schizo&quot;. The source material for the piece is the material from the original score to Psycho (short for psychopath, now known as sociopath) but rearranged and recomposed. A common symptom of the schizophenia spectrum disorders is delusion, confusion, and fantastical thinking. That makes a perfect parallel to the way the material is reorganized. It&#039;s also a tie-in to the title of the original movie. I&#039;m accurately using a clinical psychological term to describe the process of how the material was developed in the piece. I fail to see how anyone could take offense to that (unless it were through their own ignorance).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you’re confused about the meaning of “schizo”. The source material for the piece is the material from the original score to Psycho (short for psychopath, now known as sociopath) but rearranged and recomposed. A common symptom of the schizophenia spectrum disorders is delusion, confusion, and fantastical thinking. That makes a perfect parallel to the way the material is reorganized. It’s also a tie-in to the title of the original movie. I’m accurately using a clinical psychological term to describe the process of how the material was developed in the piece. I fail to see how anyone could take offense to that (unless it were through their own ignorance).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Schizo Psycho by Callum James Hackett</title>
		<link>http://aarongervais.com/music/schizo-psycho/comment-page-1/#comment-20494</link>
		<dc:creator>Callum James Hackett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongervais.com/?p=1804#comment-20494</guid>
		<description>In fairness, I would only be too &quot;PC&quot; if I said the title was rampantly offensive, which I didn&#039;t. I said it was a little tactless, which it is. I&#039;m not saying that it&#039;s morally corrupt and ought to be changed - I don&#039;t care that much. It&#039;s just that using &quot;Schizo&quot; in such a manner exploits certain stigmatised connotations of a health condition. Maybe you could also write a piece called &quot;Spaz Jazz&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fairness, I would only be too “PC” if I said the title was rampantly offensive, which I didn’t. I said it was a little tactless, which it is. I’m not saying that it’s morally corrupt and ought to be changed — I don’t care that much. It’s just that using “Schizo” in such a manner exploits certain stigmatised connotations of a health condition. Maybe you could also write a piece called “Spaz Jazz”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Schizo Psycho by Aaron Gervais</title>
		<link>http://aarongervais.com/music/schizo-psycho/comment-page-1/#comment-20491</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gervais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongervais.com/?p=1804#comment-20491</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re being way too PC. It&#039;s a play on words, there&#039;s nothing tactless about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re being way too PC. It’s a play on words, there’s nothing tactless about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Schizo Psycho by Callum James Hackett</title>
		<link>http://aarongervais.com/music/schizo-psycho/comment-page-1/#comment-20490</link>
		<dc:creator>Callum James Hackett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongervais.com/?p=1804#comment-20490</guid>
		<description>I get the reference to multiple personalities, but calling it &quot;schizo&quot; seems a little on the tactless side to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the reference to multiple personalities, but calling it “schizo” seems a little on the tactless side to me…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Composers Should Drop Out of University (and What They Should Be Learning), Part 2 by Judith Leist &#124; Judith Leist</title>
		<link>http://aarongervais.com/blog/why-composers-should-drop-out-of-university-and-what-they-should-be-learning-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-20485</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith Leist &#124; Judith Leist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongervais.com/?p=1732#comment-20485</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 2 of the article is also worth the read, and offers some solutions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Part 2 of the article is also worth the read, and offers some solutions. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: SFCMP 40th Anniversary Opening Concert: Points in Recent History by Review of the SFCMP concert &#124; Gabriele Vanoni</title>
		<link>http://aarongervais.com/blog/review-sfcmp-40th-anniversary-opening-concert-points-in-recent-history/comment-page-1/#comment-20463</link>
		<dc:creator>Review of the SFCMP concert &#124; Gabriele Vanoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongervais.com/?p=1344#comment-20463</guid>
		<description>[...] http://aarongervais.com/blog/review-sfcmp-40th-anniversary-opening-concert-points-in-recent-history/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] <a href="http://aarongervais.com/blog/review-sfcmp-40th-anniversary-opening-concert-points-in-recent-history/">http://aarongervais.com/blog/review-sfcmp-40th-anniversary-opening-concert-points-in-recent-history/</a> […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Composers Should Drop Out of University (and What They Should Be Learning), Part 1 by Aaron Gervais</title>
		<link>http://aarongervais.com/blog/why-composers-should-drop-out-of-university-and-what-they-should-be-learning-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-20256</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gervais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongervais.com/?p=1662#comment-20256</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the insightful comment, Jeffrey. In my experience, though, the issue goes beyond a revamping of curricula. It&#039;s more about how the academic environment teaches you to think, how it shapes your expectations for how you should fit into society, how it influences your interactions with your peers. All of that remains the same no matter what you teach. Besides, almost all the composers I knew in university improvised, and the vast majority had either seriously studied or initially come from some non-European style of music (including me). 

Academic environments are good at fostering collective bodies of knowledge, where each person builds upon the work of the last. Art doesn&#039;t really work that way though, at least not to the extent that quantum physics does, yet despite the unavoidable bad-fitted-ness of the situation it&#039;s gotten to the point where universities are often seen as *the* sole venue for certain types of art. That, to my mind, is one of the fundamental failures of the current system. 

It&#039;s like with finance taking over the economy. Banking was always supposed to be a tertiary, supporting role; a minor player in &quot;real&quot; business of providing value to people. Yet now it accounts for 40% of all economic activity, so no wonder the global economy is falling apart. Similarly, university was supposed to be a brief, supporting role to a compositional career, not the start and end of that career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the insightful comment, Jeffrey. In my experience, though, the issue goes beyond a revamping of curricula. It’s more about how the academic environment teaches you to think, how it shapes your expectations for how you should fit into society, how it influences your interactions with your peers. All of that remains the same no matter what you teach. Besides, almost all the composers I knew in university improvised, and the vast majority had either seriously studied or initially come from some non-European style of music (including me). </p>
<p>Academic environments are good at fostering collective bodies of knowledge, where each person builds upon the work of the last. Art doesn’t really work that way though, at least not to the extent that quantum physics does, yet despite the unavoidable bad-fitted-ness of the situation it’s gotten to the point where universities are often seen as *the* sole venue for certain types of art. That, to my mind, is one of the fundamental failures of the current system. </p>
<p>It’s like with finance taking over the economy. Banking was always supposed to be a tertiary, supporting role; a minor player in “real” business of providing value to people. Yet now it accounts for 40% of all economic activity, so no wonder the global economy is falling apart. Similarly, university was supposed to be a brief, supporting role to a compositional career, not the start and end of that career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Composers Should Drop Out of University (and What They Should Be Learning), Part 1 by Jeffrey Agrell</title>
		<link>http://aarongervais.com/blog/why-composers-should-drop-out-of-university-and-what-they-should-be-learning-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-20255</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Agrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 04:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongervais.com/?p=1662#comment-20255</guid>
		<description>Dead on the mark. I think that the success I&#039;ve had as a composer is mostly due to the fact that I&#039;ve never had a composition course. This is not in praise of ignorance - every composer must amass a huge &#039;compost heap&#039; of musical experience and ideas plus lots of experience trying stuff, hearing it played, adjusting, and trying again. I simply studied pieces and styles that interested me; imitating my chosen models for a while to learn from them, then moving to the next point of interest. I didn&#039;t have to learn what a professor decided I should learn. So I wrote music that I (as a musician) would like to play and music that I (as a member of the audience) would like to listen to. What helped me the most as far as ideas and tools for composition was taking workshops in Latin Percussion and playing jazz guitar (I&#039;m a French horn player by profession) on the side. As Ken Robinson so aptly puts it, school systematically kills creativity, and many composition classes lead budding composers into sterile (but perhaps scores that are marvelously complex graphically) compositions that have a very hard time finding either enthusiastic performers or audiences. Academic composition would benefit by learning from all styles of music - including world, pop, jazz, and folk - not just artificial compositions systems. The other ingredient that is missing that would help is if performers learned to improvise again (everyone could until the Romantic era) - not necessarily in jazz style, learn to think in music and become partners with the composer in creating new pieces that also have the pizzazz of improvised music alloyed with the structure of worked-out compositions. Music has gone astray; it&#039;s time to bring it back closer to the spirit of how it began.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dead on the mark. I think that the success I’ve had as a composer is mostly due to the fact that I’ve never had a composition course. This is not in praise of ignorance — every composer must amass a huge ‘compost heap’ of musical experience and ideas plus lots of experience trying stuff, hearing it played, adjusting, and trying again. I simply studied pieces and styles that interested me; imitating my chosen models for a while to learn from them, then moving to the next point of interest. I didn’t have to learn what a professor decided I should learn. So I wrote music that I (as a musician) would like to play and music that I (as a member of the audience) would like to listen to. What helped me the most as far as ideas and tools for composition was taking workshops in Latin Percussion and playing jazz guitar (I’m a French horn player by profession) on the side. As Ken Robinson so aptly puts it, school systematically kills creativity, and many composition classes lead budding composers into sterile (but perhaps scores that are marvelously complex graphically) compositions that have a very hard time finding either enthusiastic performers or audiences. Academic composition would benefit by learning from all styles of music — including world, pop, jazz, and folk — not just artificial compositions systems. The other ingredient that is missing that would help is if performers learned to improvise again (everyone could until the Romantic era) — not necessarily in jazz style, learn to think in music and become partners with the composer in creating new pieces that also have the pizzazz of improvised music alloyed with the structure of worked-out compositions. Music has gone astray; it’s time to bring it back closer to the spirit of how it began.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is There Such Thing As A Professional Composer? by Andrea La Rose</title>
		<link>http://aarongervais.com/blog/is-there-such-thing-as-a-professional-composer/comment-page-1/#comment-19957</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea La Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongervais.com/?p=1772#comment-19957</guid>
		<description>Fascinating read! Thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating read! Thanks…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Composers Should Drop Out of University (and What They Should Be Learning), Part 2 by Diego</title>
		<link>http://aarongervais.com/blog/why-composers-should-drop-out-of-university-and-what-they-should-be-learning-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19932</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aarongervais.com/?p=1732#comment-19932</guid>
		<description>Qué bueno esto, Arrón, muchas gracias por condensar tantas cosas que pensamos desde hace tiempo, y transmitirlas con tanta claridad.
Un placer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qué bueno esto, Arrón, muchas gracias por condensar tantas cosas que pensamos desde hace tiempo, y transmitirlas con tanta claridad.<br />
Un placer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

