Tag: culture no.1

30 Apr 2012
Tags: , , ,

Karen Got­tlieb and Julie Stein­berg bring Cul­ture no.1 to San Fran­cisco for the first time. Writ­ten in 2006, this is the piece that I took to the Gaudea­mus Fes­ti­val that same year, for harp, piano, and elec­tron­ics, and which kicks off my three-part Cul­ture series.

8:00 pm, Herbst Theatre
401 Van Ness Ave. (map)
San Francisco, California
$30 Regular, $25 Senior, $10 Student
sfcmp.org/    

Aaron Ger­vais is com­poser of new classical/avant-garde music, born in Edmon­ton, Canada, and rep­re­sented by Art Music Pro­mo­tion. He received a Bach­e­lor of Music with Hon­ours from the Uni­ver­sity of Toronto, and a Master’s degree from the Uni­ver­sity of Cal­i­for­nia at San Diego. He has also pur­sued stud­ies at the Konin­klijk Con­ser­va­to­rium in the Hague, Nether­lands. Aaron’s teach­ers have included Chan Ka Nin (CA), Chi­nary Ung (US), Philippe Manoury (FR), and Mar­tijn Padding (NL), and he has also par­tic­i­pated in mas­ter­classes with renowned com­posers from around the world. Prior to study­ing com­po­si­tion, Aaron stud­ied jazz drum­ming and Cuban folk­loric per­cus­sion, includ­ing a sum­mer of pri­vate study in Havana in 2002.

Aaron’s music has been per­formed by major ensem­bles in sev­eral coun­tries, includ­ing the Nieuw Ensem­ble (NL), ork­est de ereprijs (NL), the Ensem­ble con­tem­po­rain de Mon­treal (CA), the Nou­vel ensem­ble mod­erne (CA), Tapes­try New Opera Works (CA), Toca Loca (CA), Con­tin­uum (CA), the Knights Orches­tra (US), the Lon­don Sin­foni­etta (UK), and the Arditti Quar­tet (UK). His music has been broad­cast on CBC Radio/Radio-Canada.

Promi­nent fes­ti­vals have pre­sented Aaron’s work, includ­ing Amsterdam’s pres­ti­gious Gaudea­mus Music Week; Toronto’s New Wave, soundaXis, and SHIFT fes­ti­vals; Aberdeen’s Sound Fes­ti­val; and New York’s MATA Fes­ti­val. He was addi­tion­ally selected as a rep­re­sen­ta­tive for Canada in the 2008 World Music Days in Lithua­nia. One of his solo pieces, Flüsse-Einflüsse, was cho­sen as a required exam piece for the grad­u­at­ing accor­dion stu­dents at the Staatliche Hochschule für Musik – Trossin­gen in 2006.

Aaron was selected as the win­ner of the ork­est de ereprijs’s Inter­na­tional Young Com­posers Com­pe­ti­tion in the Nether­lands in 2009. He has also received var­i­ous other awards and grants, includ­ing an ASCAP Gould Award (2010), six prizes in Canada’s SOCAN Awards for Young Com­posers (2010, 2009, 2008, 2006, 2004, 2004), a Lieu­tenant Gov­er­nor of Alberta Emerg­ing Artist Award (2008), a SOCAN res­i­dency grant (2006), and numer­ous com­mis­sion­ing, travel, project, and study grants.

Long-term musi­cal direc­tions in Aaron’s com­pos­ing include a focus on rhythm and time, a pre­oc­cu­pa­tion with the social and cul­tural fac­tors that influ­ence lis­ten­ing and taste, an inter­est in found mate­ri­als, an explo­ration of what in fact con­sti­tutes cre­ativ­ity, and a fas­ci­na­tion with the ways that social tech­nolo­gies are chang­ing lis­ten­ing habits, to name a few. His music incor­po­rates a wide range of palettes, from rich micro­tonal tex­tures and shim­mer­ing tim­bres to bright chip­per coun­ter­point, upbeat rhyth­mic drive, blunt musi­cal ges­tures, and light-hearted humour.

Artist: Various
Year: 2009
Label: Naxos/Capstone Records, CPS 8812

My piece Cul­ture no.1 was included on the annual Soci­ety of Com­posers, Inc. com­pi­la­tion CD in 2009. This piece for harp, piano, and lap­top was cho­sen for the Gaudea­mus com­pe­ti­tion in 2006 in Ams­ter­dam, and the score has also been pub­lished by the SCI Jour­nal of Scores.

Tags: , , , , ,

Over time, my music has grad­u­ally taken on more and more aspects of my par­tic­u­lar musi­cal back­ground. I grew up play­ing jazz and rock drums in addi­tion to clas­si­cal per­cus­sion, and this influ­ence has become increas­ingly clear in my pieces, although not always in terms of direct appro­pri­a­tion. What is more com­mon is an inter­est in the cul­tural ele­ments of hear­ing: why we hear things in cer­tain ways, what it is we lis­ten for in par­tic­u­lar gen­res, and so forth.

In addi­tion, my recent pieces have taken a par­tic­u­larly crit­i­cal slant on these ques­tions. I tend not to trust state­ments or ideas that peo­ple take as axiomatic, so I have focused on writng music that decon­structs these “givens” in order to find out exactly how axiomatic they really are—chal­lenge for the sake of chal­lenge, in other words. Almost always I do find some grain of truth in the axioms, though this process of intense scrutiny serves as a sort of inspira­tion to explore some­thing new, to push my music in dif­fer­ent direc­tions, and also to bet­ter inter­nal­ize the musi­cal or per­cep­tual or cul­tural truths that I do hap­pen to stum­ble across. And what’s more, I often find myself say­ing, “Well, I was right, there really is a lot about that idea that is totally superfluous.”

So there are these two facets: one the one hand, my inter­est in cul­tural ele­ments of music, stem­ming from my back­ground in jazz, rock, clas­si­cal music, Cuban pop­u­lar and folk­loric musics, et cetera; and on the other, a kind of rebel­lious side that likes to ques­tion musi­cal author­i­ties for the fun of it.

On top of that, I also have some other more tran­sient inter­ests—flavours of the week that keep things fresh. For exam­ple, over the past few pieces, I have been inter­ested in writ­ing music that is fast-paced, rhyth­mic, and light in tex­ture. I’ve def­i­nitely writ­ten a lot of slow dark music, but it seems to me that there is a pre­pon­der­ance of that kind of thing in the new music com­mu­nity and I want to see how far I can push the other direc­tion. Com­posers like Jacob ter Veld­huis and Richard Ayres have been par­tic­u­lar inspi­ra­tions in that regard, though I am just as likely if not more to look at pop­u­lar music for this. I don’t think my music resem­bles those two com­posers very much, but they are peo­ple whose music I have thought about a lot as I write my own. And again, I also often sit and think about the Beastie Boys or the Black Eyed Peas; Aphex Twin, Björk, Stere­o­lab, or Met­ric; or what­ever. There’s some­thing to learn from any kind of music; the impor­tant thing is to actu­ally sit down with it and do the thinking.

Another thing that’s come up a lot lately is a rever­sal of for­mal pri­or­i­ties. Actu­ally, this might be start­ing to fall under the cat­e­gory of axioms I’ve chal­lenged repeat­edly instead of just a flavour of the week, but still… Many pieces by com­posers in the new music tra­di­tion have long, flow­ing forms with strong hier­ar­chi­cal inter­re­la­tions between sec­tions and seam­less tran­si­tions, often built upon a sin­gle motive or series of terse musi­cal ideas. That comes from the Beethoven tra­di­tion I sup­pose, which is as good a model as any to emu­late. But I wanted to know if there was another way to do it. So a lot of my recent music deals with very sim­ple long-term for­mal struc­tures, based on a series of unre­lated musi­cal motives that change from sec­tion to sec­tion with very lit­tle tran­si­tional mate­r­ial. Coher­ence is cre­ated through the larger sim­ple for­mal pat­terns instead of the long-term devel­op­ment of motives.

For exam­ple, Cul­ture no.1 is in four dis­creet sec­tions plus a coda. Each sec­tion is started by an audio sam­ple that the musi­cians then imi­tate, and that’s all there is to the form. No interre­la­tion between the sec­tions, no mate­r­ial that comes back later to be devel­oped. But on the local level, I have very tight inter­ac­tions between mate­r­ial, clear devel­op­ment of motives, and this helps to carry the music through from one sec­tion to the next. The global char­ac­ter of the sec­tions, how­ever, and not the local devel­op­ment, is what strings together the piece as a whole.

As the say­ing goes, talk­ing about music is like danc­ing about archi­tec­ture, and prob­a­bly this lit­tle blurb will seem com­pletely inad­e­quate tomor­row. But that’s always the way it is and I hope at least this serves as a snap­shot of what’s going on in my music right now, which is always use­ful. Actu­ally, I don’t like that quo­ta­tion; talk­ing about music is noth­ing like danc­ing about archi­tec­ture. Metaphors like that over-simplify the issue and lead to the kinds of musi­cal axioms I don’t like. Maybe it’s bet­ter not to say any­thing. So I’ll just leave it here and you can decide for your­self what my motives are, if you’re so inclined.

Tags: , ,

I’ve put up the record­ing of Cul­ture no.1 from Gaudea­mus on my Myspace page. It’s not on this web­site yet because I haven’t fig­ured out how to do stream­ing audio, and I am not able to offer this record­ing for down­load. For the time being, check it out there. You can also rank my music on Myspace… ;-)

Also, in com­ing weeks, the record­ing of my piece from the ECM tour should be broad­cast on CBC Radio 2’s Two New Hours. I’ll post the broad­cast time when it becomes available.

9 Sep 2006
Tags: ,

Cul­ture no.1 to com­pete in the cham­ber music cat­e­gory. Per­formed by mem­bers of the Nieuw Ensem­ble (Ernes­tine Stoop, harp; John Sni­jders, piano).

8:30pm, Muziekgebouw ann ‘t IJ

Amsterdam, the Netherlands
www.gaudeamus.nl    
Tags: , ,

I’m excited to have won a first prize in this year’s SOCAN com­pe­ti­tion. Cul­ture no.1 received first place in the Pierre Mer­cure Awards for a solo or duet com­po­si­tion. Inci­den­tally, this is the same piece that was cho­sen to com­pete for the Gaudea­mus prize in Sep (see entry below).

28 Jan 2006
Tags: , ,

Per­for­mance of works by first-year grad­u­ate stu­dents. Pre­mière of a piece I am writ­ing for harp and piano.

10:00am, Studio A, Warren Lecture Hall
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, CA, USA
Instru­men­ta­tion: harp, pno, laptop
Dura­tion: 9’30
Per­form­ers: Harp – Ernes­tine Stoop; Piano, Laptop – John Snijders
Pro­gramme Note

Cul­ture no.1 is the first in a series of three pieces that deal with the chang­ing role of music in cul­ture, and I wrote it while work­ing on my Master’s degree at UC San Diego. The impe­tus for the piece was a series of four unre­lated sam­ples (and one deriv­a­tive sam­ple) that I found on my hard drive, left over from other projects. The sam­ples play at var­i­ous points in the music, and in one way or another, the instru­men­tal parts derive their mate­r­ial from them.

In Cul­ture no.1, I wanted to focus on sev­eral issues that I saw as par­tic­u­larly rel­e­vant to our rapidly chang­ing cul­ture milieu. These include an imme­di­ate and sim­ple pre­sen­ta­tion of mate­r­ial, clar­ity of pur­pose, the high­est pos­si­ble degree of sim­plic­ity in the orga­ni­za­tion of mate­r­ial, and musi­cal ideas that can live “in the moment”, with­out the need to ref­er­ence large sec­tions of the piece on mul­ti­ple lev­els. These are themes that have remained impor­tant to me since and have also fig­ured promi­nently in the sub­se­quent two pieces in the Cul­ture series.

When I first wrote Cul­ture no.1, I thought of it in terms of a dichotomy between pop­u­lar music and the West­ern clas­si­cal tra­di­tion. How­ever, in the sub­se­quent years I’ve tem­pered my inter­pre­ta­tion. I no longer see a con­flict between tra­di­tions, only a reflec­tion on the rit­u­als of music-making. It is also, to a point, a test­ing of cul­tural con­ven­tions par­tic­u­lar to the concert-music rit­ual. This focus on rit­ual and cul­tural con­ven­tion is what I think makes the piece suc­cess­ful in the end. I’ve got­ten a lot of strong reac­tions to Cul­ture no.1, from “incom­pre­hen­si­ble” to “mas­ter­piece”. For me, that kind of polar­iza­tion always speaks to the cul­tural res­o­nance of a work of art, and cul­tural res­o­nance is cer­tainly appro­pri­ate to the theme I wanted to explore.